The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in areas such as public safety is increasingly in the spotlight, and the latest innovation involves using AI to write police reports. Tools like “Draft One“, developed by Axon, are already being tested in some cities in California, with the promessa to optimize the creation of essential documents in criminal proceedings. However, this application of AI raises important questions about efficiency, accuracy and, above all, fairness.
ADVERTISING
Speeding Up Police Processes
One of the main justifications for using AI in the preparation of police reports is time optimization. In departments with a shortage of staff, like the one in East Palo Alto, the use of AI promereduce the time spent by police officers writing reports, allowing more time to be dedicated to patrolling. In fact, in tests carried out, there were reports of significant time savings — in some cases, reports were completed in minutes, instead of tens of minutes.
For many, this efficiency represents a practical solution to resource shortages and overburdened police forces, especially at a time when the number of officers on duty has been reduced due to crises such as the one sparked by the protests following the death of George Floyd. The idea that an AI tool could free up up to 20% of police officers’ time is appealing to many corporations.
The Impact on Accuracy and Impartiality
despite promeoptimization purposes, there are legitimate concerns about the impact of AI use on the accuracy and fairness of reporting. Police records play a vital role in the criminal justice system: they influence the decisions of prosecutors, judges, and even the defense of a defendant. If these records are inaccurate or biased, the consequences can be serious, resulting in erroneous judicial decisions.
ADVERTISING
Recent studies have not yet found significant time savings in all situations, and some errors have been reported, such as confusion about who was involved in the incident or about the relationship between the individuals present. These “small” errors, if not corrected, canpromehave the integrity of the report.
Another critical issue is the possibility that police officers could in the future disclaim responsibility for errors in reports by claiming that they were generated by AI. This could weaken the ability of defense attorneys to challenge the veracity of statements. Therefore, transparency about the use of AI in the creation of such documents is crucial, and some departments already require officers to take responsibility for any content generated by the tool.
The Role of AI in Creating Community Relationships
One of the unexpected effects of using AI in the police field is the change in officers' behavior during incidents. With AI basing reports on transcripts of body camera audio, many officers began to verbalize events more, describing in detail what they were seeing or doing.. This, according to some experts, can even improve relationships with the community, as citizens better understand what police officers are doing and why they are acting in a certain way.
ADVERTISING
However, this type of narrative can also be manipulated. There are reports of officers who, on occasion, shouted “stop resisting” to justify the use of force, even when the person was cooperating. Therefore, the use of AI does not solve the problem of bias and, in some cases, may even reinforce it.
The use of AI in police reporting is just beginning, but debates about its impact are already intense. The efficiency promemust be balanced with the accuracy and integrity of the judicial process. It is vital that tools like Draft One are continually monitored and evaluated to ensure they are fulfilling their purpose without compromising the accuracy and integrity of the judicial process.promehave justice. As technology advances, caution will be essential so that innovations bring more benefits than risks to the criminal justice system.
Read also
