Image credits: AFP

Barbarism yes, but terrorism? How the acts of January 8th can be classified according to Brazilian legislation

The attacks on the headquarters buildings of the Three Powers in Brasília, on January 8, were called 'acts of terrorism' due to the size of the destruction and the purpose of imposing fear and demonstrating power. Likewise, the scammers who carried them out are constantly being called 'terrorists'. But, after all, can the acts in the federal capital be covered by the anti-terrorism law? O Curto talked to experts; just listen to what they said. 🎧

O Curto News spoke with the criminal lawyer and professor Aury Lopes Junior regarding the topic.

ADVERTISING

According to Aury, the acts carried out on January 8th in Brasília do not fall within any form of freedom of opinion or expression, they are crimes: very serious.

It classifies the conduct carried out as crimes of qualified damage, criminal association, attempted abolition of the Democratic Rule of Law and attempted coup d'état.

The professor emphasizes that in the case of these two crimes (attempted abolition of the Democratic Rule of Law and attempted coup d'état), the mere attempt is punished with the same penalty as a consummated (concluded) crime.

ADVERTISING

And terrorism? Aury explains that there is a lot of talk about terrorism in the 'vulgar' sense, which is accepted. However, there is no provision in Brazilian legislation for terrorism for political reasons.

The professor states that the arrests in the act, carried out on Sunday (8) and Monday (9), are in accordance with the law.

Aury also clarifies that it is during the custody hearings that it is decided who should or should not remain in prison. It is up to the Federal Supreme Court (STF) – which is the final recipient of these investigations – to decree temporary, preventive arrests or precautionary measures other than imprisonment.

ADVERTISING

He comments that he hopes that acts against democracy are properly investigated and that their financiers are punished and emphasizes: “whoever financed is the author and will also answer for the crimes”.

Regarding the situation of the former president Jair Bolsonaro, Aury assesses that, in theory, he could be considered a participant in the acts, to the extent that he instigated/stimulated them through public demonstrations.

We also talked about the subject with Andrey Régis de Melo, public defender and director of the Criminal Defense Center of the Public Defender's Office of the State of Rio Grande do Sul. Listen to what he said: 🔊

ADVERTISING

Want to know more? (I.e.

Video by: BBC News

Read also

Receive news and newsletters do Curto News via Telegram and WhatsApp.

Receive news and newsletters do Curto News by Telegram e WhatsApp.

Click here and download the app Curto News for Android.

Scroll up