International press predicts Brazil divided after 'tense' elections

Some of the main international press outlets highlight the tense nature of the campaign for the second round presidential elections and see the country as polarized. This picture leads to the assumption that the difference in votes between the candidates will be small. For the British daily Financial Times, Brazilians will decide between two politicians with dramatically different visions for the most populous nation in Latin America. The newspaper classifies this year's electoral process as "long and bitter".

The Wall Street Journal highlights the “tense” nature of the second round of elections, which will have “broad implications for the largest economy in Latin America and the Amazon rainforest”.

ADVERTISING

Bloomberg says that the dispute between President Jair Bolsonaro (PL) and former President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT) was “bitter and, at times, violent” and raised concern among electoral authorities and international allies.

Already Associated Press highlights the clash between a candidate who “promeprotect conservative Christian values” and a former president who intends to return the country “to the prosperity it once had”.

For Reuters, the election offers a second chance for Lula and Bolsonaro. While the former president will try to return to a path of “prosperity” after the PT was marked by corruption scandals, the current president promeconsolidate its conservative turn, “after one of the deadliest epidemics in the world and widespread deforestation in the Amazon basin”.

ADVERTISING

According to The New York Times, today’s election represents much more than a “mere dispute between the left and the right”. The newspaper highlights the increase in deforestation in the Amazon under the Bolsonaro government and the president's attacks on democratic institutions in the last four years.

“Guns, God and fake news” dominated this year’s presidential race, according to CNN. The campaign focused on social problems and cultural war, with little discussion of agendas and projects, allowed greater participation of religious leaders and the dissemination of fake news, analyzes the American broadcaster.

(With Content Status)

Scroll up