The study was carried out by researchers from Johns Hopkins and Harvard universities, with a nationally representative sample in the United States, and published in JAMA Network Open magazinesystem. (🇬🇧)
ADVERTISING
To arrive at the result, the researchers offered research participants a menu of fast food where they could select an item they would like to order for dinner.
Participants could view menus with one of three labels: quick response code on all items (control group); the low climate impact green label applied to chicken, fish or vegetarian items (positive framing); or high climate impact red label on red meat items (negative framing).
Compared to control group participants, 23,5% more participants selected a sustainable menu item when they displayed high climate impact labels and 9,9% of participants selected a sustainable menu item when menus displayed low climate impact labels.
ADVERTISING
Participants who selected a sustainable item rated their order as healthier than those who selected an item that was not sustainable.
The research authors said: “We found that labeling red meat items with negatively framed high climate impact red labels was more effective in increasing sustainable selections than labeling non-red meat items with positively framed low climate impact green labels". (The Guardian*)
Read also
(🚥): may require registration and/or signature
(🇬🇧): content in English
(*): content in other languages ​​is translated by Google Tradutor
ADVERTISING
Receive news and newsletters do Curto News by Telegram e WhatsApp.