Technology

Should technology companies be responsible for the content they publish? US Supreme Court rules

The Supreme Court of the United States analyzes this Tuesday (21) a historic case that could transform the Internet: the court decides whether technology companies, such as Google or Facebook, must be legally responsible for the content they publish.

Posted by

Barbara Pereira

February 21, 2023, 15:00

The nine judges began to address at 10 am (12 pm Brasília time) the scope of a law that, since 1996, grants a certain immunity to companies.

The case is linked to the November 2015 attacks in Paris and stems from a complaint against the Google presented by relatives of Nohemi González, one of the 130 victims of these attacks. The American was studying in France and died in the Belle Equipe cafeteria at the hands of a commando from the Islamic State (IS) group. His parents accuse YouTube, a subsidiary of Google, having recommended videos from the jihadist group to some of its users.

According to them, “by recommending ISIS videos to its users, the Google helped the EI to spread his message and thus provided material support.”

Federal courts rejected the complaint in the name of a legal provision known as “Section 230”, adopted when the Internet was in its infancy and which became one of its pillars. This section decrees that Internet companies enjoy legal immunity for the content they publish because they are not a “publisher”.

Nohemi González's family believes, on the contrary, that the Google was not limited to distributing ISIS content, but that its service selected users to offer them the jihadist group's videos – therefore it cannot claim this immunity.

“The selection of users to whom ISIS videos were recommended was made using computer algorithms created and implemented by YouTube”, they argue in an appeal sent to the Supreme Court. By accepting this appeal, the high court insinuates that it isaria willing to change jurisprudence.

“The recommendations provided by algorithms are what make it possible to find needles in humanity’s biggest haystack,” wrote the Google to the court, asking that it “not harm a central part of the modern Internet”.
Allowing platforms to be sued for their algorithms “would expose them to liability for third-party content at virtually all times,” the group says Meta (Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp), in another argument.

(With AFP)

Read also

Meta executive says that metaverse will not be monopolized and talks about “internet renaissance”

The World Government Summit (WGS) took place in Dubai, between the 13th and 15th of February. There, the metaverse became a topic of discussion several times. Web3 governance and the commercial power of the tool were frequent topics. According to Meta's President of Global Affairs, Nick Clegg, in a speech during the event, the metaverse means the “rebirth of the internet”. Understand.

Do you know what 'big tech' is?

Technology companies have come into the spotlight recently and the term 'big tech' has gained more relevance. Do you know what it means? O Curto will explain!

This post was last modified on February 21, 2023 15:00 pm

Barbara Pereira

Journalist with experience in multimedia production, I believe that social networks are essential for reaching new audiences and disseminating information in accessible and relaxed language. I share my passion for communication with books, travel and gastronomy.