Lawyer uses ChatGPT to sue airline but citations were false; understand

Over the weekend, a case of a lawyer who used the ChatGPT for a process petition. The big controversy is that, mistakenly, the chatbot cited non-existent cases from other processes.

Now, the lawyer could face strong sanctions after the wide repercussion of the case, which was published in The New York Times.

ADVERTISING

In a statement presented last Thursday, the lawyer admitted to having used the ChatGPT to complement your research into the case. He stated that he was not aware of the possibility that the information provided by the chatbot could be false. 

The case involves Avianca and a passenger who claims to have been injured during a flight to New York. The airline asked a federal judge to dismiss the case, and the defense cited other similar cases as support for its allegations. The point is that three of these mentioned cases, “Varghese v. China Southern Airlines”, “Martinez v. Delta Airlines” and “Miller v. United Airlines” never existed. 

Now, on June 8, a meeting will take place to discuss possible punishments for the professional. The lawyer, in turn, admitted that he regretted having used the ChatGPT e promeYou have to be more careful and observe the authenticity of the content.

ADVERTISING

See also:

Scroll up